Conditional Probability · Bayes' Formula

Lesson 6

Nikolai Chukhin · Alexander S. Kulikov

Let's consider a canonical example of using this formula, which will once again turn out to be counterintuitive. Suppose there is a certain disease that, on average, affects one person out of a hundred. And there is a test that detects this disease fairly well. It is reliable but not 100 percent accurate:

  • If a person is healthy, the test will indicate illness with a probability of \(5\) percent (false positive error).

  • If a person is ill, the test will indicate no disease with a probability of \(10\) percent (false negative error).

The following illustration helps to remember the terminology of errors.

The test seems quite reliable (it errs with a probability of only \(5\)\(10\) percent). Suppose that for a randomly chosen person, the test was positive. Is the person really ill? We already know that this may not be the case since the test sometimes makes mistakes. Therefore, a more reasonable question is: what is the probability that this person is actually ill?

Problem. Check your intuition! What is the approximate probability that a randomly chosen person with a positive test result is actually ill?

5 points
  1. \(0.95\)

  2. \(0.85\)

  3. \(0.75\)

  4. \(0.65\)

  5. \(0.55\)

  6. \(0.45\)

  7. \(0.35\)

  8. \(0.25\)

  9. \(0.15\)

  10. \(0.05\)