Conditional Probability · Bayes' Formula

Lesson 6

Nikolai Chukhin · Alexander S. Kulikov

Let's consider a canonical example of using this formula, which will once again turn out to be counterintuitive. Suppose there is a certain disease that, on average, affects one person out of a hundred. And there is a test that detects this disease fairly well. It is reliable but not 100 percent accurate:

  • If a person is healthy, the test will indicate illness with a probability of \(5\) percent (false positive error).

  • If a person is ill, the test will indicate no disease with a probability of \(10\) percent (false negative error).

The following illustration helps to remember the terminology of errors.

The test seems quite reliable (it errs with a probability of only \(5\)\(10\) percent). Suppose that for a randomly chosen person, the test was positive. Is the person really ill? We already know that this may not be the case since the test sometimes makes mistakes. Therefore, a more reasonable question is: what is the probability that this person is actually ill?

Problem. Check your intuition! What is the approximate probability that a randomly chosen person with a positive test result is actually ill?

This problem can only be submitted at Cogniterra.
  1. \(0.95\)

  2. \(0.85\)

  3. \(0.75\)

  4. \(0.65\)

  5. \(0.55\)

  6. \(0.45\)

  7. \(0.35\)

  8. \(0.25\)

  9. \(0.15\)

  10. \(0.05\)